2010年9月11日 星期六
Science reflection on Alien Volcanos
New telescope may unveil alien volcanoes
Friday, 10 September 2010 Stuart Gary
ABC
Artist's conception shows an extremely volcanic moon
New research suggests that astronomers using the James Webb Space Telescope may detect volcanic activity on a distant exoplanets (Source: Wade Henning)
Related Stories
* Exoplanet bonanza fuels excitement, Science Online, 28 Jul 2010
* Super-Earth has rocky surface: study, Science Online, 22 Oct 2009
* Alpha Centauri may have Earth-like worlds, Science Online, 19 Mar 2008
Scientists will soon be able to study volcanoes on worlds beyond our solar system, according to a new study.
Reporting in the Astrophysical Journal, Dr Lisa Kaltenegger an astronomer with the Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics, and colleages, believe the future James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) will allow scientists to detect eruptions on rocky planets orbiting nearby stars.
They say the JWST, due to be launched in 2014, should be able to detect faint signs of volcanism on a rocky planet less than 30 light-years away.
"Using the James Webb Space Telescope, we could spot an eruption 10 to 100 times the size of Pinatubo for the closest stars," says Kaltenegger.
The 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines spewed 17 million tonnes of sulphur dioxide into the stratosphere, and was one of the largest volcanic eruptions in recent times.
Volcanic models
In their study Kaltenegger's team developed models to explain how eruptions on exoplanets leave a telltale atmospheric signature.
They found sulphur dioxide from very large, explosive eruptions is potentially measurable because of the volume of material produced and the time it takes to "wash out of the atmosphere".
To look for volcanic sulphur dioxide, astronomers would rely on a technique known as secondary eclipse, which requires the exoplanet to cross behind its parent star as seen from Earth.
By collecting light from the star and planet, then subtracting the starlight (while the planet is hidden), astronomers are left with the signal from the planet alone.
They can search that signal using spectroscopy for signs of particular chemical molecules.
"Our first sniffs of volcanoes from an alien Earth might be pretty rank," says Kalteneger. "Seeing a volcanic eruption on an exoplanet will show us similarities or difference among rocky worlds."
Comparitive lessons
Planetary scientist Dr Simon O'Toole from the Australian Astronomical Observatory says exoplanetary volcanism would give new insights into the physics and geology of planets.
"But the solar system itself is a target-rich environment. Places like Io and Venus shows us volcanism in action on other worlds," says O'Toole.
"And let's not forget cryovolcanism of the type we see on Saturn's moons Titan and Enceladus, or the Neptunian ice moon Triton."
Reflection:
If this is really true, I'm delighted. We all know that on the Venus, there is a lot of volcanos. I'm really looking forward to seeing the video footage of volcano movements on Venus or one of Saturn's moon. I could not believe how fast technology is improving. A few hundred years back, we don't even know there is a solar system, but now, we can see even a small detail on one of Saturn's moon.
However, I think that to be able to see the movements of other planets, the steps taken is over complex and that there is no need to splash all our money on looking at other planets. We are on the Earth and thats it. Anything beyond Earth is basically none of our buisness unless the Mars explodes or something. What is the point of looking at Mars when you know in your life, you are not going to visit it?
However, I must still praise the scientists who found that this can be humanly possible. Since this might be useful to finding out what the solar system was like maybe a few thousand years ago. But really, its mainly money down the drain.
2010年9月9日 星期四
Hybrid cars
To start off, there is a many type of power sources for hybrid cars:
# On-board or out-board rechargeable energy storage system (RESS)
# Petrol
# Diesel
# Hydrogen
# Compressed air
# Liquid nitrogen
# Human powered e.g. pedaling or rowing
# Wind
# Electricity
# Compressed or liquefied natural gas
# Solar
# Waste heat from internal combustion engine.
# Coal, wood or other solid combustibles
# Electromagnetic fields, Radio waves
The most common type of combinations are actually petrol-electricity, diesel electricity and the most fuel efficient diesel-electric. However, most cars does not use equal amounts of each energy at the same time, as power sources such as solar and wind are not always guranteed and electricity will run out quite fast and putting a lot of battery will affect the aerodynamics of the car quite badly. So, most hybrid cars use 80% fuel(petrol and diesel) and 20% others.
The main reason why hybrid cars are becoming more and more popular is that its fuel consumption is genuinely low. For example, a normal Honda Civic goes 24 miles to a gallon when traveling at 96km/h. However, traveling at the same speed, the hybrid Civic can hit 45mpg! So, by spending $5000 more to buy a hybrid car, you halved the amount you pay for fuel.
Hybrid cars also genuinely pollutes less because the 2 power sources share the job and thus produce less emmusions. This is because if you have a diesel-solar car, in which diesel pollutes very much, the solar cell share the job of running the car. So the diesel engine will be valving less and causing less pollution.
However, I think that hybrid is not the way forward. They are being used in a incorrect way. Because in the UK, cars are taxed by how much they pollute the country. So, a car firm built a petrol-electric car that only have enough electricity to run for a mere 6 miles and then its petrol all the way. This is just a way to sell your car. Mind you, 6 mile is basically 9.6km, which is from Tuas Second Link to just after Boon Lay, which is not even enough to get you to the city if you live in Marine Parade. So, don't buy a scam hybrid car, get yourself a normal road car.
2010年9月5日 星期日
Science reflection on bacteria
Skin is Home to Zoo of Bacteria
February 2007 - A new study by Martin J. Blaser, Chair of the Department of Medicine and Professor of Microbiology at NYU School of Medicine, and others, published in the online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences has found that human skin, the largest organ in the body, is "home to a virtual zoo of bacteria."
Led by senior research scientist Zhan Gao, MD, the research took more than three years to complete and used a powerful molecular method to sample bacteria on the forearms of six healthy subjects. Analysis identified 182 species of which 8 per cent were previously unknown.
Martin Blaser commented:
"This is essentially the first molecular study of the skin. There are probably fewer than ten labs in the US looking at this question. It is very intensive work."
This research, part of ongoing studies of human microbial ecology, found that some bacteria appeared to be effectively permanent resident on the skin; others were transient. Researchers explain that that the body has ten times more microbes than cells, with bacterial populations changing according to how we live. Maintaining population stability may contribute to health.
Researchers took swabs from three male and three female volunteers' inner right and left forearms halfway between the wrist and the elbow. Four of the individuals were retested 8 to10 months later. About half (54.4 per cent) of bacteria identified were species known to be effectively permanently resident on human skin (Propionibacteria, Corynebacteria, Staphylococcus and Streptococcus). However, the six individuals differed markedly in the overall composition of bacteria sampled with only four species in common (Propionibacterium acnes, Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum, Streptococcus mitis, and Finegoldia AB109769).
Zhan Gao said:
"This is a surprise. But many things affecting the skin affect bacteria, such as the weather, exposure to light, and cosmetics use."
The study found that 71.4 per cent of the species were unique to individual subjects, suggesting that the skin surface is highly diversified in terms of bacteria harbored. Three species were found in male subjects only (Propionibacterium granulosum, Corynebacterium singulare, and Corynebacterium appendixes). While not conclusive, researchers suggest that that there may be gender differences in the pattern of species harbored. Researchers found that bacterial populations varied over time but each individual had a core predominant set.
Martin Blaser explained:
"What that suggests is that there is a scaffold of bacteria present in everybody's skin. Some stay and others come and go."
Researchers point out that skin condition is affected by a variety of factors such as climate, diet, personal hygiene, and disease. Skin is never free of bacteria but these are not pathogenic in healthy people.
Martin Blaser added:
"Many of the bacteria of the human body are still unknown. We all live with bacteria all our lives and occasionally we smile, so they're not that bad for us."
Reflection:
I am very surprised by the fact that 142 types of bacteria live on our skin, and 11 of them are previously unknown. I am also happy to know that the bacterias are not pathogenic to normal healthy people. This meant that I can not worry about this kind of micro organisms on my skin. This discovery might just relieve many people from their worries that the micro organisms might damage their health. Even though most of the bacteria are unique to certain objects, some are not. So our hand might share the same bacteria with our hair! It is very frightening to discover this, as I genuinely thought that our hair is more dirty than our hands, and all the bacteria in it is pretty dangerous.
However, I am also relieved to know that most of the bacterias are unique to each body part as it would be safer to know that even if our kidney share bacteria with our intestines, it's not very much. This will definately relieve me of my worries that my heart will one day become like my intestines.
This discovery is a very significant to me one as it helps us understand what is actually on our body. It also helps us to know that even though a bacteria might be dangerous, it isn't really as dangerous as we thought. There might even be extremely useful bacterias lying on my hand the very moment I am typing the words that is helping me with something. But I don't really think that this will be the grand total number of bacterias on our body, so scientists all over the world, please discover the rest.
2010年9月3日 星期五
F1 weight
2010年8月29日 星期日
2010年8月20日 星期五
2010年8月14日 星期六
2010年8月6日 星期五
Science reflection on Wireless tire pressure monitoring in cars
Wireless tire pressure monitoring systems in cars may compromise privacy, pose security threat
Published: Thursday, August 12, 2010 - 09:16 in Physics & Chemistry
New wireless technologies in cars may compromise a driver's privacy and pose a security threat, warn researchers at Rutgers University. Modern automobiles are increasingly equipped with wireless sensors and devices, such as systems that monitor air pressure inside tires and trigger dashboard warnings if a tire's pressure drops. The Rutgers researchers have shown that these wireless signals can be intercepted 120 feet away from the car using a simple receiver despite the shielding provided by the metal car body.
Since signals in tire pressure monitoring systems (TPMS) include unique codes from each wheel sensor, this raises concerns that drivers' locations could be tracked more easily than through other means, such as capturing images of license plates.
The Rutgers researchers and their collaborators at the University of South Carolina are presenting results of their work this week at the USENIX Security Symposium, one of the premiere academic computer security conferences. The researchers are experts in wireless communication and computer networking security.
TPMS wireless transmissions also lack security protections common in basic computer networking, such as input validation, data encryption or authentication. The researchers demonstrated how a transmitter that mimics, or "spoofs," the sensor signal can easily send false readings and trigger a car's dashboard warning display. This could prompt a driver into stopping his or her car when there is actually nothing wrong with the tires.
"We have not heard of any security compromises to-date, but it's our mission as privacy and security researchers to identify potential problems before they become widespread and serious," said Marco Gruteser, associate professor of electrical and computer engineering and a member of the university's Wireless Information Network Laboratory (WINLAB).
He notes that tire pressure monitoring is the first widespread use of in-car wireless networking, and because of the increasing cost and complexity of wired electronic systems, it's reasonable to expect other aspects of automobile operation to come under wireless control.
"A spoofed signal could potentially cause serious safety concerns if stability control or anti-lock braking systems relied on the data," he said. "So we are sounding the alarm right now."
Gruteser acknowledged that intercepting and spoofing signals is not a casual effort. But the fact that people with college-level engineering expertise could carry out those actions using publicly available radio and computer equipment costing a few thousand dollars shows that systems are vulnerable.
Tire pressure monitoring was widely implemented starting around 2000 using systems that measure and compare wheel rotation speeds. A mismatch infers that a tire is underinflated. This method wasn't accurate enough to meet U.S. regulatory requirements that took effect later in the decade, so automakers started installing systems that directly monitor air pressure inside the tires and transmit that information to a control unit. The two systems that Rutgers examined are commonly used in vehicles manufactured during the past three years.
"While we agree this technology is essential for driver safety, more can be done to improve security, such as using input validation or encryption," said Wade Trappe, a collaborator on the project who is an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering and associate director of WINLAB.
The researchers' South Carolina collaborators, led by Wenyuan Xu, a former doctoral student at WINLAB and now an assistant professor at the University of South Carolina, were able to intercept a signal more than 30 feet from the car using a simple antenna and more than 120 feet away by adding an amplifier. They were able to analyze the radio signal and reverse-engineer the code using common laboratory instruments. With that knowledge, they built a transmitter that spoofed a sensor's wireless message.
In tests using their own cars, the researchers were able to send false signals from one car and trigger a "low tire pressure" light in another while driving next to each other at 35 miles per hour. They were also able to trigger the dashboard "check tire pressure" light while driving next to each other at 65 miles per hour.
The researchers also found that at least one tire pressure system could be damaged through spoofed wireless signals.
Source: Rutgers University
Reflection:
I think that this is a very worrying piece of news. Currently, the speed of the cars are increasing but not the technology of the suspension, brakes and the foundation of the European car tests are not getting stricter. The wireless system was introduced by Mercedes Benz in 2004 on their S class saloon and everyone else copied the idea. With wireless gadgets currently on the rise, prevention of pirates must also increase. However, this is not the case, as evidence from the above news. Tire pressure have always been a vulnerable part of the car, and 30 percent of car accidents in UK have involved the malfunction of the tires, mostly because of low tire pressure at high speed. With the speed of small car brands like Ariel increasing constantly with every new spec of the Atom, other technology must also improve. Even though the Ariel Atom doesn't have wireless system, it is extremely light. However, their suspension and gearbox does not cope well in high speed, so it was not caught on. So I plead car makers to improve their system, and even though technology have improved, measures must be taken against illegal activities.
2010年7月28日 星期三
Science reflection on DNA Test which may speed colon cancer diagnosis
Article:
DNA Test May Speed Colon Cancer Diagnosis
By NICHOLAS WADE
Published: August 9, 2010
A new generation of DNA tests for colon cancer seems likely to improve the detection both of cancers and of the precancerous polyps that precede them. The tests, if validated, could reduce the burden of disease substantially by detecting tumors at an early stage, including those not picked up by a colonoscopy.
Colorectal cancers tend to grow slowly and are easily removed if caught early. But many people over 50 do not comply with the recommendation to have a colonoscopy — a time-consuming procedure in which a tube is threaded up the intestine — and even colonoscopies do not catch everything. Colorectal cancer has become the second most common cancer in the United States; each year it causes more than 50,000 deaths and costs about $14 billion to treat.
Colon tumors provide considerable evidence of their presence by shedding blood and cells that are detectable in the stool. Tests for blood have reduced deaths from colorectal cancer only modestly, because they are not very sensitive to precancerous polyps, the stage at which cancer is best prevented.
Researchers turned to measuring mutations in DNA after Dr. Bert Vogelstein of Johns Hopkins University discovered the series of mutations by which a colon polyp advances to full cancer. But no single mutation predicts a patient’s risk, and the mutation tests, though more accurate than the blood tests, have not been a decisive improvement.
By 2004 it was clear that looking for the Vogelstein mutations was “neat biology but not a home run,” said Dr. David Ransohoff, an expert on colon cancer screening at the University of North Carolina.
A new generation of tests being developed depends on a different process in cancer cells. All cells switch off the genes they do not need by attaching small chemicals called methyl groups to certain sites along their DNA. In cancer cells, there is generally less methylation than usual, except for certain regions of DNA where the methylation process is taken to excess, perhaps because the cells need to shut down tumor suppressor genes. These and other genes are highly methylated in colon tumors and other kinds of cancer.
Exact Sciences, a company based in Madison, Wis., is developing a colon cancer test based on highly methylated DNA. Its researchers reported last month that by testing for methylated DNA at four markers, pieces of DNA drawn from specific genes, they could detect colon tumors and polyps, distinguishing them from normal tissue with 100 percent sensitivity and with no false positives.
The tests of methylated DNA were performed directly on tumors and are expected to be less accurate in the real world, in which they would have to work in stool samples. Almost all of the DNA in stool is from bacteria, and the methylated DNA is a fraction of the 0.01 percent that is human DNA.
Still, Kevin T. Conroy, chief executive of Exact Sciences, said he expected that the four-marker test, when applied to stool samples, would detect at least half of all precancerous polyps and 85 percent of actual cancers. Results of a trial now under way in 1,600 patients will be reported in October, he said.
The test would cost less than $300, and samples could be collected at home. Patients would be advised to take the test every three years. People with a positive result would then have a colonoscopy to verify and remove any polyps, with the result that colonoscopies could be focused on high-risk patients instead of the population at large.
Exact Sciences’ test is based on work by Dr. Vogelstein, Dr. Sanford Markowitz at Case Western Reserve University and Dr. David A. Ahlquist of the Mayo Clinic. Dr. Ahlquist, who is a scientific adviser to the company, identified some of the highly methylated genes the company is testing as markers for colon cancer.
Dr. Ahlquist said that if the test worked as well as hoped on stool samples, “this will be the first noninvasive test that will reliably detect malignant lesions.” Cervical cancer has been virtually eliminated by the Pap test, he said, and “we feel that colon cancer could be eliminated to the same extent.”
The four-marker test can pick up a kind of precancerous tissue called a serrated polyp which is often missed by colonoscopies, Dr. Ahlquist said. It also ignores most innocuous small polyps.
Using different sets of four markers, other kinds of cancer can be detected. “We can detect all of the cancers above the colon — pancreas, esophagus, stomach, bile duct,” Dr. Ahlquist said. Thus in principle, all the cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, which account for nearly a quarter of all cancer deaths in the United States, should be detectable from stool samples.
Dr. Vogelstein said tests for DNA mutations would be better in theory than tests for DNA methylation because “mutations are entirely specific and they are what is driving the tumor”; the methylation is less causative and increases naturally with age.
But the DNA methylation tests are promising in principle, he said, and it seems feasible for Exact Sciences to get a sensitivity of better than 90 percent and a false positive rate of only 5 to 10 percent. “We can tolerate 5 to 10 percent false positives because those people will just get colonoscopies,” he said.
For cancers above the colon, there are many enzymes that digest DNA, so whether such cancers can be detected efficiently can be answered only with experiments, Dr. Vogelstein said. And false positives would be more of a problem, since for these cancers there is no easy verification method like colonoscopy. “That’s when these false positives really start to be the devil,” he said.
Dr. Ransohoff said the Exact Sciences test was still at a preliminary point. “This is neat and it’s promising,” he said. “But we’ve been down this road before and we need to be hopeful without being carried away.”
A version of this article appeared in print on August 10, 2010, on page D1 of the New York edition.
Reflection:
I think that if this can really speed up the time taken to diagnose colon cancer, it would be really great. This might just save a percentage of the 50000 people who died because of colon cancer. The 14 billion dollars used to treat colon cancer can be used on medicare and getting newer devices and also try to find out a way that can maybe treat colon cancer faster and even cure it after the disease reached its peak. It is really heartening to hear that a new way of diagnose for colon cancer is going to be discovered, as being the second most common cancer in the US, it kills many, especially since that most US people lead a very unhealthy lifestyle. Actually, the best way to prevent cancer from happening is actually to lead a healthier lifestyle and exercise often to prevent cancer from happening in the first place. Why must the many people who got colon cancer waste 14 billion of their money on treating a disease that really shouldn't happen in the first place? So, my verdict is, the new DNA test way may just speed up the diagnosis of the colon cancer, but it may be incurable. The best is still not to get cancer of any kind. The first step to do that is to lead a healthy lifestyle.
2010年2月28日 星期日
Questions about density
Why and how did the density of water change when salt was added to it?
The density of the water increases. The salt have a greater density than the water. So, when salt is added into the water, the density of the water increases.Why did the egg sink in the tap water but float when salt is added?A
At the start, the density of the egg is bigger than the water, so it sank. But when salt is added, the density of the water increased. The density is then more than the egg. So the egg floats.